Sports Illustrated’s Cover Controversies: When Glory Meets Scandal
Sports Illustrated’s Cover Controversies: When Glory Meets Scandal
For nearly seven decades, Sports Illustrated (SI) has been synonymous with athletic excellence, cultural moments, and iconic photography. Its annual “Swimsuit Issue” and legendary covers featuring athletes at the peak of their careers have cemented its place in pop culture. However, behind the glamour and prestige, Sports Illustrated has also faced numerous controversies, from racial bias and sexism to ethical dilemmas and public backlash. These scandals have forced the magazine to confront its own legacy, prompting debates about media accountability, representation, and the power of visual storytelling.
This article explores some of the most infamous Sports Illustrated cover controversies, examining how they shaped public perception, challenged industry norms, and ultimately redefined the magazine’s role in sports and society.
—
The Evolution of Sports Illustrated: From Glory to Scandal
Founded in 1954 by Henry Luce, the same publisher behind Time and Life, Sports Illustrated was created to bring sports journalism to a broader audience. Initially, it focused on hard-hitting investigative reporting and in-depth analysis. Over time, however, the magazine became as much a cultural institution as a sports publication, with its covers often dictating which athletes were considered “it” in any given year.
While SI has celebrated many groundbreaking athletes, its covers have also sparked outrage, sparking conversations about fairness, bias, and the commercialization of sports. Below are some of the most notorious controversies that have plagued the magazine.
—
1. The Black Athlete Cover Controversy (1970s, Present)
One of the most persistent criticisms of Sports Illustrated has been its underrepresentation of Black athletes on its covers. Despite African American athletes dominating sports, from Muhammad Ali and Michael Jordan to Serena Williams and LeBron James, SI has often been accused of playing favorites, favoring white athletes or delaying Black stars’ cover appearances.
Key Examples of Racial Bias in Cover Selection
- Muhammad Ali (1967, 1971) , Though Ali was the most famous athlete of his era, SI only put him on the cover once during his prime (1971). Comparatively, white boxers like Joe Frazier and George Foreman received multiple covers.
- Michael Jordan (1980s, 1990s) , Jordan, arguably the greatest basketball player of all time, was featured on SI’s cover 21 times, more than any other athlete in the magazine’s history. Critics argued this was due to his marketability rather than pure athletic dominance.
- LeBron James vs. Stephen Curry , In 2016, LeBron James, who had already won four NBA championships, was not on the cover of SI’s annual “Sportsman of the Year” issue. Instead, the cover featured Stephen Curry, who had just won the MVP but had fewer championships. Fans and media outlets criticized SI for favoring Curry’s “story” over LeBron’s longevity.
- Serena Williams (2017) , After Serena Williams won her 23rd Grand Slam title, SI chose to feature Roger Federer on its cover instead. The decision sparked outrage, with many arguing that Williams, a Black woman, deserved the recognition.
Why Does This Matter?
These controversies highlight a broader issue in sports media: who gets celebrated, and why. While SI has made strides in recent years, featuring more Black athletes on covers, critics argue that systemic biases still exist. The magazine’s decisions often reflect commercial interests rather than pure athletic achievement, reinforcing stereotypes about which athletes are “marketable” enough for mainstream appeal.
—
2. The “Swimsuit Issue” Backlash: Exploitation and Objectification
No discussion of Sports Illustrated controversies would be complete without addressing its annual Swimsuit Issue, first published in 1964. While the issue has become a cultural phenomenon, it has also faced intense criticism for promoting sexual objectification, particularly of women.
Controversies Surrounding the Swimsuit Issue
- Objectification of Women , Critics argue that the issue reduces women to their physical appearance, reinforcing harmful beauty standards. Many models have spoken out about the pressure to conform to unrealistic ideals.
- Lack of Diversity , For decades, the Swimsuit Issue was dominated by white models, with Black and Latina women often sidelined. In 2016, SI faced backlash when it featured only one Black model in the issue, prompting calls for greater representation.
- Ethical Concerns Over Body Positivity , While the magazine has attempted to diversify its models in recent years, some argue that the issue still perpetuates thinness as the only acceptable standard, despite efforts to include curvier and plus-size models.
The Push for Change
In response to criticism, Sports Illustrated has made some adjustments:
- More Inclusive Casting , The 2020 Swimsuit Issue featured 20% models of color, up from previous years.
- Body Diversity , The magazine has included plus-size models and models with disabilities, though some activists argue more progress is needed.
- Criticism of “Body Positivity” as Performative , Despite these changes, many feminists and activists claim that the Swimsuit Issue still exploits women’s bodies for commercial gain, regardless of representation efforts.
—
3. The “Sportsman of the Year” Debates: Who Deserves the Honor?
Every year, Sports Illustrated selects a Sportsman of the Year, a title that carries immense prestige. However, the decision has been met with criticism for favoring charismatic overachievers rather than the most deserving athletes.
Notable Controversies
- 2016: Stephen Curry Over LeBron James , As mentioned earlier, Curry’s MVP season was deemed more “newsworthy” than LeBron’s fourth championship, leading to accusations of media bias.
- 2018: Tom Brady Over Serena Williams , Brady, a five-time Super Bowl champion, was named Sportsman of the Year, while Williams, who had just won her 23rd Grand Slam, was not even considered. Many fans argued that Williams’ achievement was historically more significant.
- 2020: Simone Biles Over NBA Stars , In a rare move, SI chose Simone Biles, the most decorated gymnast in history, over NBA stars like LeBron James and Kevin Durant. While this was seen as a positive shift, some critics wondered why it took so long for a Black woman to receive such recognition.
The Problem with “Sportsman” as a Gendered Title
Another persistent issue is the gendered nature of the award. While SI has occasionally featured women (like Biles and Serena Williams) on its cover, the Sportsman of the Year title implies a male-centric perspective. Some argue that the magazine should rename the award to Sports Personality of the Year to be more inclusive.
—
4. The “Fake News” Cover (2017) and Media Trust
In 2017, Sports Illustrated made headlines, not for sports, but for politics. The magazine released a satirical cover featuring President Donald Trump holding a “Fake News” sign, with the headline “Fake News” in large letters. The cover was meant as a satirical jab at Trump’s rhetoric, but it backfired spectacularly.
Why the Cover Went Wrong
- Perceived as Biased , Many conservatives saw the cover as anti-Trump propaganda, reinforcing the idea that SI was a liberal media outlet.
- Trump’s Response , The president banned Sports Illustrated from the White House, calling the cover “very disrespectful.”
- Backlash from Readers , Both left-leaning and right-leaning readers criticized the magazine, with some arguing that satire had crossed into partisanship.
The Aftermath
- Sports Illustrated apologized, stating that the cover was meant to be humorous rather than inflammatory.
- The incident highlighted the challenge of satire in a polarized media landscape, where even well-intentioned humor can be misinterpreted.
- It also raised questions about where the line is between editorial freedom and political bias in mainstream media.
—
5. The LeBron James “Most Influential Athlete” Cover (2018) and the Backlash
In 2018, Sports Illustrated featured LeBron James on its cover with the headline “The Most Influential Athlete of All Time.” While this was a long-overdue recognition of LeBron’s impact on and off the court, the magazine’s accompanying article sparked controversy.
What Went Wrong?
- The Article’s Tone , The piece downplayed LeBron’s activism, focusing instead on his business ventures (SpringHill Company) and charitable work (I PROMISE School). Critics argued that the magazine ignored LeBron’s political activism,
